Mystic Chords of Memory, by Michael Kammen
(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991): 864
Reviewed by Laura Heinrich
With the turn of the century approaching, America
waxes
retrospective once again, catching the fin-de-siecle mood of past
centuries. This glance
back naturally uses memory -- our collective memory -- as a tool of
interpreting the past.
Kammen's book Mystic Chords of Memory adequately hooks onto this
wagon,
surveying the period of 1870-1990 for historical, literary, and artistic
remnants of
American devotion to memory. Kammen has devoted an immense amount of
historical
fact to the study, chronicling the growth and development of historical
societies,
erections of historical monuments, government funding for preservation,
and academic
and popular sentiment through documented testimonies, public lectures, and
private
letters. He wisely chooses to document the sentiments of highly visible
officials --
presidents, historians, elite academia, wealthy patrons -- as well as the
"common man's"
sentiments and actions.
His findings, however, are less than conclusive.
Collective memory
has become a catch-all term in recent academia as well as popular culture,
but it remains
an elusive category of thought. As we commonly discuss memory, it can be
personal,
familial, local, or national. Kammen's book deals with national historic
memory and the
interplay of memory with tradition and myth. The exact boundaries of
memory, myth,
and tradition are hazy, and in Mystic Chords the terms are
interchangeable. The
terms need more clarification to serve their purpose more effectively.
Kammen chooses
not to provide a definitive meaning to these terms, but rather chronicles
their appearance
in common parlance. He demonstrates America's pragmatic approach to
memory -- the
things we choose to remember and the things we choose to forget. A
pattern of cultural
amnesia and cultural re-remembering takes shape out of the material Kammen
lays
before us.
Starting around 1870, Kammen tracks America's lack of
historical
interest. The general trend was to view democracy as inherently
uninterested in the past
-- as forward reaching. Only for the cultural elite (Hawthorn, and later
Henry Adams and
Henry James) was America's lack of history disgraceful. However, American
interest
grew as the turn of the century approached, with a marked increase in the
number of
historical societies and interest in American literature. This growth
occurred separately
from any government intervention -- rather, the nation strongly held that
it was the
private sector's duty to protect our history, not the government's. Hence
the expatriates of
earlier decades returned home, investing their money in Americana. Kammen
closely
investigates magnates such as Henry Ford and John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and
the role they
played as benefactors of collective memory. Both men's zeal for
preservation of the past
resulted in "living" museums such as Colonial Williamsburg and The Wayside
Inn.
Characteristic of the first two decades of the twentieth century, it was
the wealthy who
collected Americana for its "folk" appeal. Later, in the war and interwar
period,
collection of American antiques became a popular pastime in almost all
circles, as well
as the construction of colonial style buildings (from Hollywood to New
York), and
genealogy. There was an attempt to reach an "authentic" past, directly
through the
products of colonial life. Kammen notes that at times this "authenticity"
takes on farcical
and political aspects.
Yet at this time a counter trend developed of
"debunking" our
cultural myths about the past. Cultural elites, personified by the likes
of Henry Adams,
Charles Francis Adams, John Dos Passos, and Edith Wharton, argued for the
demythification of our history. Forefather worship, common with the
average man,
lacked grounding in actual historical fact. This elite urged American
schools to provide
more in the way of American history, and less in the way of jingoism and
nationalistic
propaganda.
A major theme of Kammen's study is the ways in which
America
has utilized the past in order to construct an adequate national identity.
American
memory, far from maintaining any sort of cohesion, has changed its nature
throughout the
course of Kammen's study. Post Civil War sectionalism was fought against
by a
nationalist tradition of memory -- ignoring the recent past in order to
smooth over recent
hostility, and instead focusing on revolutionary heroes as landmarks of
American
solidarity. Later, with the influx of immigrants, national cohesion was
provided by
ignoring the many textured history of immigration, and substituting
multiplicity and
heterogeneity with the common theme of democracy and the melting pot.
Once again,
cultural amnesia allowed for national cohesion.
From the inter-war through the post war period, Kammen
follows
the expanding role of the government in the cultural production of memory.
F.D.R.'s
W.P.A programs helped to support the fledgling role of the government in
protection of
the past, as thousands of paid civilians built access roads to national
parks, restored
national landmarks, wrote guidebooks, and placed markers of historic
sights along the
highways. These programs lost support during and after the war, but the
continued
growth of the national park service, as well as the growth of the
Smithsonian and the
construction of the national archives, testifies to the expanded role of
the federal
government in historical preservation. It is interesting that America,
unlike its European
counterparts, felt that our national memory and history was best preserved
by "the
people" rather than the government until the very recent
past.
The closing chapters of the book focus on the growing
commercialism of history through the mass media. History, according to
Kammen, has
been dislocated from the actual past, functioning as a sort of panacea of
continuity in a
nation which feels disjointed and fractured. In typical post-modern
fashion, Kammen
discusses the growth of history as a depthless tool of cohesion, rather
than a meaningful
discourse. From the material that he gives, however, I judge that this is
not a recent
phenomena. History has always been the raw material which memory uses
for its own
national, political, and personal projects. The mass media has aided this
project, but it is
not the culprit. The many testaments to memory recorded in this book
attest to the fact
that history has always been at our disposal -- from Disney World to Mount
Rushmore.
Back to Bibliography