Vinyl Leaves: Walt Disney World & America, by Stephen M.
Fjellman
(Boulder:Westview,1992):492pp
Reviewed by Matthew Gibson
Walt Disney World, a world of "vinyl leaves," says Mr.
Fjellman. And what exactly does he mean by this? Quite a bit more than
might first meet our eyes. In the opening sentence of the book, Mr.
Fjellman explains from where the title comes for his
critique/celebration of the Disney Empire, "There is a tree in central
Florida," quite a cute and subtle stock phrase from epic tradition to
open a discussion of what we soon see is a subject of "epic" stature,
"It is maybe ninety feet high and huge around the base and has a crown
that stretches across almost as many yards as the tree is tall." This
is bigger than any tree I've ever seen but, as Mr. Fjellman soon tells
us, "it's not made of wood... [t]he trunk and branches are formed out of
prestressed concrete wrapped around a steel-mesh frame." The bark and
green stuff that cover much of it are painted on." And what's more, the
"leaves, all 800,000 of them, are made of vinyl" (1). Thus Mr.Fjellman
begins his intriguing and powerful study with an image that, while
branching out in all directions of amusement and consumerism, intimates
the crux of his message: the Disney way of magnitude, quantity, and
fakeness is the "American way" of reality and being.
Throughout the work, Fjellman methodically asserts the
manner in which WDW (Walt Disney World) is both the mirror and the
quasi-generator of contemporary American (and what is becoming more
infectious to the rest of the world with "Euro-Disney" and
"Tokyo-Disney") consumer culture. He frames his entire narrative with
the assertion that "the commodity form...is the hegemonic truth of our
times" in that it breeds and permeates our values, maintains the power
of the classes (i.e. corporations) that create and control it, and
establish and define who and what we are. WDW is the quintessential
corporation in that it produces its own material goods to be "bought"
and consumed, but what's more important is that the WDW experience is
itself a commodity that defines "you" as an American. Fjellman suggests
that with the development of EPCOT (Experimental Prototype Community of
Tomorrow) Disney is a sort of corporate czar into which other
corporations buy for the sake of advertising their own technologies and
future prosperity. And as consumers of this WDW experience, we go on a
consumeristic pilgrimage to the great cathedral of Cinderella's Castle
or the great EPCOT golf-ball in the sky. And why do we go? Because,
Fjellman continually proposes, we want an escape from our boring, dirty,
and unsafe lives that lie just outside the 27,433 acres of central
Florida that is Disney-owned. We want a clean safe environment, but,
above all, we want to be AMUSED and we want all aspects of this
amusement to be at the convenience of a short walk for quick and easy
consumption.
The method Fjellman follows to make this argument is as
fascinating as it is disturbing (disturbing only in the sense of how
what he says makes me feel so disgusted with myself and fellow
human-beings). Fjellman sets out to contextualize the present state of
consumerism as it has developed in the history of America. Of course,
to do this in the 20 pages that he does, something is bound to be
over-generalized. However, the basic trend that he charts is an
effective one as far as its applicability to "Disney culture:" the
American as (s)he evolved through the turn of the century and into the
present lost the sense of "value" of what Fjellman implies to be the
"essential" qualities that "used to be" inherent in us and in the world
around us. What happened, I believe Fjellman is suggesting, is that the
trend of deconstruction, as it developed amidst the discontents of
civilization, began to dissolve the "essences" of things where one no
longer felt secure and stable with what something "meant" (did they
ever?). So in the midst of uncertainty and potential "meaninglessness,"
the consumer was born; one who was left to assert identity through what
(s)he owned, or, in the case of WDW, what (s)he
experienced.
For the next few chapters Fjellman begins to correlate
consumerism with the rise of WDW and Disney's tactics for success. For
example, he explains how Walt, going incognito under some dummy
companies, proceeded to not only buy up over 27,000 acres of central
Florida for his "amusement," but even convinced the state to set up the
acreage as the Reedy Creek Improvement District which more or less made
WDW its own governing kingdom that would decide for itself what its own
needs and resources would be and how they would be developed so that the
State of Florida itself would have little say over the Magic Kingdom's
activities. But what is more important for Fjellman is the ideology
that WDW was built to project to its visitors an ideology that was as
clean as the pedestrian paths on which they walked. Among other "clean"
and "fake" developments, Disney created its own form of American History
what Fjellman pejoratively terms (and rightly so), "Distory" a "tidy"
narrative that showed how well the American white man (and not so often
the woman or African-American) had controlled Nature something that the
park itself makes a point of doing and had "made his dreams come
true." In this slide show history with Mark Twain and Ben Franklin as
your robotic tour guides, Vietnam is reduced to one slide of a
helicopter rising above some palm fronds while Edison's invention of the
light bulb earns the appropriately longer 15 seconds of fame. Again,
Fjellman is sure to have the reader know that WDW is truly clean, fake,
family fun, both physically and mentally.
The most important aspect of this work is how "fake"
becomes the real. Citing several theorists of postmodern culture
(Frederic Jameson included), Fjellman emphasizes how decontextualized
WDW is how it places Japan next to Russia in the World Showcase of
EPCOT,how amusement is possible through a Disneyfied version of history,
how amusement and secure consumption is actually possible in America.
The experience of Disney is real and we become surrounded by so many
images that are a mixture of the real and the imaginary, the fleshly and
the robotic, that we find ourselves clapping for a performance given by
electronic dummies and smile spitefully at the young goofy-looking
Disneyite who is trying to help us get seated, who is actually a human
being. This is the postmodern, Fjellman asserts, this is the
decontextualized, and "even when people can tell the difference between
the real and the fake, increasingly they do not care. As long as we are
amused, Neil Postman might say, it is enough" (401). Indeed, Disney is
not, Fjellman claims, to be feared like Big Brother in 1984, but rather,
Disney should be seen as a closer analogue to Aldous Huxley's Brave New
World, where through great amusement ("soma") that the park gives us, we
are ready to reintegrate ourselves back into the world outside of the
Magic Kingdom and live our lives herding about, consuming and "being" by
consuming. And when life gets disappointing again, when we feel unsafe,
unclean, and un-American, we can always go back, for another 50 bucks,
and enter our temporary paradise of "vinyl leaves."
Back to Bibliography