Woodrow Wilson Department of
Politics
PLPT 424
G. Klosko
The Duty to Obey the
Law 248-B Cabell; x3092
Spring 2003 gk@virginia.edu
The
following books have been ordered at the University Bookstore and are on
reserve in Clemons
Library.
All articles and shorter readings are on reserve on line on the class
toolkit page.
J. Locke, Two
Treatises of Government (Cambridge, paperback).
R. Nozick, Anarchy,
State and Utopia (Basic Books, paperback).
A. J. Simmons, Moral
Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton, paperback).
I have also ordered a few
copies of:
J. Rawls, A Theory of
Justice (Harvard, paperback).
I. Introductory: Political Obligation and Reflective
Equilibrium
Simmons, Moral
Principles and Political Obligations, Chaps.1-2.
Rawls,
A Theory of Justice (first ed.), pp. 19-21, 46-53, 578-86; (second
ed., pp.
D.
Jamieson, "Method and Moral Theory," in A Companion to Ethics,
P. Singer, ed.
L.
Green, "Who Believes in Political Obligations?" in Justifying the
State, J. Sanders
and J. Narveson, eds.
II. Consent Theories of Political Obligation
Locke, Second Treatise
on Civil Government.
Simmons, Moral
Principles and Political Obligations, Chaps. 3-4.
H. Pitkin,
"Obligation and Consent, I" American Political Science Review,
59 (1965).
J. Waldron,
"Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism," Philosophical Quarterly,
37 (1987).
M. Walzer,
"Political Alienation and Military Service," in Obligations
(Cambridge,
Mass., 1970).
G.
Klosko "Reformist Consent and Political Obligation," Political
Studies, 39 (1991), 676-90.
III. The "Conceptual Argument"
H. Pitkin,
"Obligation and Consent, II" American Political Science Review,
60 (1966).
IV. Nozick: Invisible Hand Explanations
Nozick, Anarchy,
State, and Utopia, Chaps. 1-7.
V. Consequentialist Theories
Rawls, A Theory of
Justice, Sec. 5.
Rawls, "Two Concepts
of Rules," Philosophical Review, 64 (1955).
G. Hardin, "The
Tragedy of the Commons," Science, 162 (1968).
D. Parfit, Reasons and
Persons, pp. 53-86.
C. McMahon, "Autonomy
and Authority," Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16 (1987), 315-19.
G. Klosko, "Parfit's
Moral Arithmetic and the Obligation to Obey the Law," Canadian
Journal of Philosophy, 20 (1990).
VI. The Argument from Gratitude
Simmons, Moral Principles
and Political Obligations, Chap. 7.
A. D. M. Walker, "Political Obligation and the Argument
from Gratitude," Philosophy and
Public Affairs, 17 (1988).
VII. The Natural Duty of Justice
Rawls, Theory of
Justice, Secs. 1-9, 11, 19, 24-6, 51-53.
Simmons, Moral
Principles and Political Obligations, Chaps. 6, 8.
T. Senor, "What If
There Are No Political Obligations?" Philosophy and Public Affairs,
16
(1987).
Simmons, "The
Anarchist Position: A Reply to Klosko and Senor," Philosophy and Public
Affairs, 16 (1987).
J. Waldron, "Special
Ties and Natural Duties," Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22 (1993).
Klosko,
""Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice," Philosophy and Public
Affairs, 23 (1994), 251-70.
VIII. The Principle of Fairness
C. Strang, "What If
Everyone Did That?" Durham University Journal, 53 (1960).
Rawls, "Legal
Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play," in S. Hook, ed., Law and
Philosophy.
Nozick, Anarchy,
State, and Utopia, pp. 90-95.
Simmons, Moral
Principles and Political Obligations, Chap. 5.
Klosko, "Presumptive
Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation," Philosophy and Public
Affairs, 16 (1987).
Simmons, "The
Anarchist Position: A Reply to Klosko and Senor," Philosophy and Public
Affairs, 16 (1987).
Klosko, "The
Obligation to Contribute to Discretionary Public Goods," Political Studies, 38
(1990).
Simmons,
"Consent, Obligation, and Anarchy," from On the Edge of Anarchy.,
pp.
Klosko,
"The Natural Basis of Political Obligation," Social Philosophy and
Policy, 18 (2001), 93-114.
Simmons,
"Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later," from Justification and Legitimacy.
IX. "Associative Obligations"
R. Dworkin, Law's
Empire, pp. 190-216.
M. Gilbert, "Group
Membership and Political Obligation," Monist, 76 (1993).
J. Horton, Political
Obligation, Chap. 6.
A. J. Simmons,
"Associative Political Obligations," Ethics, 106 (1996).
Requirements
Aside
from doing the reading and discussing it, there are three written requirements.
1. Optional midterm and final
examinations.
2. Analytical paper, 12-15 pages; due Wednesday, 23 April. Papers must be handed in on
time. Late papers will be penalized. Incompletes will not be given.
Grading: If you choose to do the midterm, it will count 25%
of your grade, with paper and final exam
each counting 37.5%. If you do not do the midterm, paper and
final exam will count 50% each. Class participation will figure in on top of
this, with good participation
significantly helping your grade.