<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exam 3 information and open thread</title>
	<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/</link>
	<description>The future of higher education?  You.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Plogger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-806</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-806</guid>
					<description>Is there an old test uploaded somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an old test uploaded somewhere?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Plogger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-805</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-805</guid>
					<description>Is there an old exam uploaded somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an old exam uploaded somewhere?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Plogger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-804</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-804</guid>
					<description>Is there an old exam uploaded anywhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an old exam uploaded anywhere?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: berger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-803</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-803</guid>
					<description>On the module question...I need to fix this.  Done!  Try it now, and sorry for the confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the module question&#8230;I need to fix this.  Done!  Try it now, and sorry for the confusion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: berger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-802</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-802</guid>
					<description>Okay, so on Ex. 7.3, I understand what you are saying, but the book's math is correct.  Here's why.  Remember that the Q calculation relies on two quantities:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;$$A'$$:  all the area on one side of the joint (in this case, above the T connection)
&lt;li&gt;$$\bar{y}'$$:  the centroid of the area $$A'$$
&lt;/ul&gt;
So the point is that the $$\bar{y}'$$ parameter does not point to the location of interest. Rather it points to the centroid of the &lt;em&gt;area of interest&lt;/em&gt;. Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so on Ex. 7.3, I understand what you are saying, but the book&#8217;s math is correct.  Here&#8217;s why.  Remember that the Q calculation relies on two quantities:</p>
<ul>
<li><img src="http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/wp-content/cache/tex_37a12b78a9ca96989ad7ceceacb37ea2.png" align="absmiddle" class="tex" alt="A'" />:  all the area on one side of the joint (in this case, above the T connection)
</li>
<li><img src="http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/wp-content/cache/tex_3c37a5a2da798029cbeac2e8550893f9.png" align="absmiddle" class="tex" alt="\bar{y}'" />:  the centroid of the area <img src="http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/wp-content/cache/tex_37a12b78a9ca96989ad7ceceacb37ea2.png" align="absmiddle" class="tex" alt="A'" />
</li>
</ul>
<p>So the point is that the <img src="http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/wp-content/cache/tex_3c37a5a2da798029cbeac2e8550893f9.png" align="absmiddle" class="tex" alt="\bar{y}'" /> parameter does not point to the location of interest. Rather it points to the centroid of the <em>area of interest</em>. Make sense?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim Ottinger</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-801</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-801</guid>
					<description>Mr. Berger,
I am confused in the Q calculation for problems that ask for the maximum shear stress in the glue necessary to hold the boards together along the seam where they are joined.  On page 398, example 7.3, in their Q calculation, they take y' (bar) as (0.180-.015-.120)m and A' as (.03)(.150)m.  The way I look at it, the shear stress should be evaluated at the joint of the two boards, where the glue is applied, and not in the middle of the board on top, because the glue wouldn't be applied 0.150m horizontally, it would be only be applied .03m across the top of the vertically standing board.
The way I look at it, y'(bar) should be (.180-.03-.120).
Could you clarify this?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Berger,<br />
I am confused in the Q calculation for problems that ask for the maximum shear stress in the glue necessary to hold the boards together along the seam where they are joined.  On page 398, example 7.3, in their Q calculation, they take y&#8217; (bar) as (0.180-.015-.120)m and A&#8217; as (.03)(.150)m.  The way I look at it, the shear stress should be evaluated at the joint of the two boards, where the glue is applied, and not in the middle of the board on top, because the glue wouldn&#8217;t be applied 0.150m horizontally, it would be only be applied .03m across the top of the vertically standing board.<br />
The way I look at it, y&#8217;(bar) should be (.180-.03-.120).<br />
Could you clarify this?<br />
Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tiu2f</title>
		<link>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-800</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ejb9z/Weblog/2009/04/14/exam-3-information-and-open-thread/#comment-800</guid>
					<description>I can't play any of the modules above</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t play any of the modules above
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
