
September 14 |
Andreas Hartmann, Université Bordeaux I (visiting University of Richmond)Interpolation and weak interpolation in backward shift invariant subspaces |
September 28 |
James Rovnyak, UVaSchur complements and positive polynomials in one and several variables (expository lecture) |
October 5 |
Craig Kleski, UVaCommutative and noncommutative Shilov boundariesThe commutative Shilov boundary is a generalization of the maximum modulus theorem to uniform algebras in C(X). Since C(X) is the prototypical abelian C*-algebra, this boundary has a natural generalization to certain subspaces and subalgebras of (noncommutative) C*-algebras. It provides an answer to the following question: how is the C*-algebra generated by a concrete operator system S related to the C*-algebra generated by a completely isometric image of S? |
October 19 |
Bill Ross, University of RichmondAlgebras of truncated Toeplitz operators IRecently, Nic Sedlock characterized the maximal algebras in the truncated Toeplitz operators. In these two talks, we will give an exposition of Sedlock's work and discuss when different maximal algebras of truncated Toeplitz operators are spatially isomorphic to each other. |
October 26 |
Bill Ross, University of RichmondAlgebras of truncated Toeplitz operators IISee previous week's abstract. |
November 2 |
Tom Kriete, UVaDistance in the Calkin algebra between composition operators |
November 16 |
Andreas Hartmann, Université Bordeaux I (visiting University of Richmond)Analytic continuation in backward shift invariant subspaces |
November 30 |
David Sherman, UVaA unified representation theory for Hilbert space operators IWe prove general results that hold in any of four categories of unital singly-generated objects: C*-algebras, hereditary manifolds, operator algebras, and operator spaces. An overarching goal is to give various answers to the following question: for x and y operators on separable Hilbert spaces, when is there a morphism from the object generated by x to the object generated by y, taking x to y? In this first talk I will explain most of the main concepts. Then I'll prove that any morphism can be written as the composition of an amplification, an approximate unitary equivalence, and a spatial morphism. (Historical note: some of this is directly descended from ideas that were first exposed in a series of UVa operator seminars given by Jim Agler in the 1980s.) |
December 7 |
David Sherman, UVaA unified representation theory for Hilbert space operators IIWe prove general results that hold in any of four categories of unital singly-generated objects: C*-algebras, hereditary manifolds, operator algebras, and operator spaces. An overarching goal is to give various answers to the following question: for x and y operators on separable Hilbert spaces, when is there a morphism from the object generated by x to the object generated by y, taking x to y? In this second talk I will explain how each category is paired with a specific operator topology, and I'll introduce the apparently new semistrong operator topology. Then I'll generalize a theorem of Hadwin relating closed unitary orbits to spatial representations. Putting this together with last week's theorem, we get that the set of representations of x is exactly the closure of {x} in an appropriate topology. |