HIST 506 PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY Allan Megill
University of Virginia
Spring 1999
3:30-6:00 Mondays
c:\wpdocs\0syllabi\50699de2.yes
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND REQUIREMENTS
Instructor Contact Information: Office Location: 221 Randall Hall.
Office Hours: Tu Th 3:30-4:30, and by arrangement. You should not feel confined to my scheduled office hours. An efficient means of arranging appointment times is by e-mailing me, at megill@virginia.edu; it is best to e-mail me a day or two in advance. Often, I can arrange meetings at other times than the official hours (Friday afternoons are often a good time to see me, and sometimes Wednesday afternoons). Note: On occasion I shall have to cancel office hours because of other obligations. It is helpful, therefore, to contact me ahead of time even if you plan to come during regularly scheduled hours. I cannot guarantee my presence at any particular scheduled office hour, unless you have alerted me that you will be coming to see me then.
Telephone Numbers: Office: 924-6414 (voicemail after several rings if there is no answer). Home: 971-8744 (answering machine after several rings). You shouldn't hesitate to phone me at home: I prefer by far working there to working in Randall Hall. If we are otherwise occupied we generally don't answer the phone; but avoid 5 pm-8 pm, and don't phone later than 10:30 pm.
E-mail: megill@virginia.edu Home page: http://www.people.virginia.edu/~adm9e
Course Subject and Rationale: The class aims to provide a reflective history of the core of Western historical thinking and writing, and also at the same time to provide some theoretical devices for understanding historiography generally. Thus it combines history and theory. The accompanying syllabus, and the handout listing the contents of the class packet, will give you a fairly good idea of the coverage of the course. It is my contention that some knowledge of the history of historiography and of the rudiments of historical theory is essential if one is to understand and "do" history at the highest level. The risk in not having this knowledge is that one is more likely to fall into banality or error.
The course is intended to be useful to students both in the discipline of history and outside it. To the former it offers an entré to the far from negligible field of historical theory. To the latter it offers a quick way of gaining some sense of how historians (as distinguished from literary scholars, political scientists, anthropologists, scholars in religious studies, and so on) think about the past. To both groups, it perhaps offers some new perspectives on some specific works or genres of history.
Each time that I teach this course I have in hand one or more writing projects related to it (you will note from the "Class Packet Contents" that many of the items listed are my own; most of them were worked up, at least in part, during previous teachings of the course). This semester I have a number of "philosophy of history" writing projects on hand (since I am mostly working on Marx at the moment, it is hard to know how much progress I shall make on them). One project is a paper on the tendency in certain quarters to over-value, even to romanticize narrative. Another, far less well developed project is a paper on "History, Science, and the Culture Wars." I am obliged to produce something for the latter project, since I am scheduled to give a lecture on that topic at Duke at the end of March. Of the three papers that I had underway in this class a year ago, two are now in print and the other, as you will see in the class packet, is in a coherent form, although it has not yet been published.
Course Requirements: Practically speaking, the most important requirement of this, and other, 500-level courses that I teach is the writing of a fairly substantial paper (of 20-25 page length). The topic of the paper needs in some way to be related to the theme of the course: that is, the paper will need to deal with issues of history-writing, or of historical thinking more generally, and it will also need to connect with some of the specific literature that we shall be dealing with in class.
Undergraduate students are well advised to look for a paper topic that they already have some experience with, through other courses or through their own reading. History graduate students who take this class generally try to write a paper in which they apply what they learn in this class to their empirical research field. Mutatis mutandis, graduate students in other departments either do the same thing, or they introduce me to relevant literature in their field (on such issues as evidence, narrative, and the like). All paper topics are to be discussed in advance with me. You are expected to have given me, in writing, an overview of your proposed topic by the week of March 1-5, 1999 at the latest. Note that if you are graduating, there are severe time constraints in regard to the writing of the paper.
In addition, you will also be expected to participate effectively in the collective work of the class. In particular, you will be asked, once or twice, to be the "reporter" for part or all of a class session, producing an account of the discussion that you will post on the class e-mail list by a day before the next class. You will also be expected, once or twice, to produce some sort of short written response, also to be posted on the class list, to the reading that we will be doing. So that I can keep this work in mind during final grading, please hold onto copies of this writing, and submit these copies when you submit the final paper. (If you aren't easily able to print off e-mail messages, let me know: I can usually supply a copy.)
Although I have never taken attendance in my classes, it has occurred to me that I ought to have a record of class attendance, and so I expect to pass around a notebook each class session for you to sign in on. I do not fixate on attendance, but since my 500-level classes have tended to get larger than they used to be, I have thought that out of fairness I should have a record of attendance at the end of the semester.
The e-mail list is an important part of the course. Enrolled students, and others interested in the course, should immediately put themselves on the e-mail list. Send a message to
majordomo@Virginia.edu
with the message text:
subscribe hist506-phil
end
The wording must be exactly as above, with no extra words, phrases or spellings. The commands must appear on two lines as shown.
Course Reading: The following books are required for the course. Note that they are all on reserve, except for one book that has just been published. I have ordered copies of all books at the University of Virginia Bookstore:
Fritz Stern, ed., The Varieties of History from Voltaire to the Present, revised ed.
R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, revised edited by Jan Van der Dussen
Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History
Brian Fay, Philip Pomper, and Richard T. Vann, eds., Contemporary History and Theory: The Linguistic Turn and Beyond (Malden, MA; Blackwell, 1999).
There is also a class packet for this course. It is available at The Copy Shop, 5b Elliewood Avenue, phone 295-8337 and is priced at $22.95.
Students may need to photocopy some additional material from time to time, but there will be very little such copying required. For a listing of the course reading more or less as it will be considered in class, see the handout entitled "Syllabus/Selected Bibliography."